[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1976719.1606378781@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:19:41 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, bfields@...ldses.org,
trond.myklebust@...merspace.com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/18] crypto: Add generic Kerberos library
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> > Here's my first cut at a generic Kerberos crypto library in the kernel so
> > that I can share code between rxrpc and sunrpc (and cifs?).
>
> I can't find the bit where you are actually sharing this code with
> sunrpc, am I missing something?
I haven't done that yet. Sorry, I should've been more explicit with what I
was after. I was wanting to find out if the nfs/nfsd people are okay with
this (and if there are any gotchas I should know about - it turns out, if I
understand it correctly, the relevant code may being being rewritten a bit
anyway).
And from you, I was wanting to find out if you're okay with an interface of
this kind in crypto/ where the code is just used directly - or whether I'll
be required to wrap it up in the autoloading, module-handling mechanisms.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists