[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <434167b4-c2df-02bf-8a9c-2d4716c5435f@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:30:15 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
On 11/27/20 10:59 AM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> Losing arbitration is normal in a CAN-bus network, it means that a
> higher priority frame is being send and the pending message will be
> retried later. Hence most driver only increment arbitration_lost, but
> the sja1000 and sun4i driver also incremeant tx_error, causing errors
> to be reported on a normal functioning CAN-bus. So stop counting them
> as errors.
Sounds plausible.
> For completeness, the Kvaser USB hybra also increments the tx_error
> on arbitration lose, but it does so in single shot. Since in that
> case the message is not retried, that behaviour is kept.
You mean only in one shot mode? What about one shot mode on the sja1000 cores?
> Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com>
I've split this into two patches, and added Fixes: lines, and pushed this for
now to linux-can/sja1000.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can.git/log/?h=sja1000
regards,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists