lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201127140128.GC3555@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:01:28 -0300
From:   Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To:     saeed@...nel.org
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...lanox.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next V2 09/15] net/mlx5e: CT: Use the same counter for both
 directions

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:48:18PM -0700, saeed@...nel.org wrote:
> From: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...lanox.com>

Sorry for reviving this one, but seemed better for the context.

> 
> A connection is represented by two 5-tuple entries, one for each direction.
> Currently, each direction allocates its own hw counter, which is
> inefficient as ct aging is managed per connection.
> 
> Share the counter that was allocated for the original direction with the
> reverse direction.

Yes, aging is done per connection, but the stats are not. With this
patch, with netperf TCP_RR test, I get this: (mangled for readability)

# grep 172.0.0.4 /proc/net/nf_conntrack
ipv4     2 tcp      6
  src=172.0.0.3 dst=172.0.0.4 sport=34018 dport=33396 packets=3941992 bytes=264113427
  src=172.0.0.4 dst=172.0.0.3 sport=33396 dport=34018 packets=4 bytes=218 [HW_OFFLOAD]
  mark=0 secctx=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 zone=0 use=3

while without it (594e31bceb + act_ct patch to enable it posted
yesterday + revert), I get:

# grep 172.0.0.4 /proc/net/nf_conntrack
ipv4     2 tcp      6
  src=172.0.0.3 dst=172.0.0.4 sport=41856 dport=32776 packets=1876763 bytes=125743084
  src=172.0.0.4 dst=172.0.0.3 sport=32776 dport=41856 packets=1876761 bytes=125742951 [HW_OFFLOAD]
  mark=0 secctx=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 zone=0 use=3

The same is visible on 'ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-conntrack -s' then.
Summing both directions in one like this is at least very misleading.
Seems this change was motivated only by hw resources constrains. That
said, I'm wondering, can this change be reverted somehow?

  Marcelo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ