[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201128221635.63fdcf69@hermes.local>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 22:16:35 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <haliu@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
<toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 0/5] iproute2: add libbpf support
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:38:50 +0800
Hangbin Liu <haliu@...hat.com> wrote:
> This series converts iproute2 to use libbpf for loading and attaching
> BPF programs when it is available. This means that iproute2 will
> correctly process BTF information and support the new-style BTF-defined
> maps, while keeping compatibility with the old internal map definition
> syntax.
>
> This is achieved by checking for libbpf at './configure' time, and using
> it if available. By default the system libbpf will be used, but static
> linking against a custom libbpf version can be achieved by passing
> LIBBPF_DIR to configure. FORCE_LIBBPF can be set to force configure to
> abort if no suitable libbpf is found (useful for automatic packaging
> that wants to enforce the dependency).
>
> The old iproute2 bpf code is kept and will be used if no suitable libbpf
> is available. When using libbpf, wrapper code ensures that iproute2 will
> still understand the old map definition format, including populating
> map-in-map and tail call maps before load.
>
> The examples in bpf/examples are kept, and a separate set of examples
> are added with BTF-based map definitions for those examples where this
> is possible (libbpf doesn't currently support declaratively populating
> tail call maps).
Luca wants to put this in Debian 11 (good idea), but that means:
1. It has to work with 5.10 release and kernel.
2. Someone has to test it.
3. The 5.10 is a LTS kernel release which means BPF developers have
to agree to supporting LTS releases.
If someone steps up to doing this then I would be happy to merge it now
for 5.10. Otherwise it won't show up until 5.11.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists