[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201130222848.GA5215@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:28:48 -0800
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com
Cc: ceggers@...i.de, olteanv@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
andrew@...n.ch, robh+dt@...nel.org, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kurt.kanzenbach@...utronix.de,
george.mccollister@...il.com, marex@...x.de,
helmut.grohne@...enta.de, pbarker@...sulko.com,
Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com, Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/12] net: dsa: microchip: PTP support for
KSZ956x
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:01:25PM +0000, Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com wrote:
> The 1588 PTP engine in the KSZ switches was designed to be controlled closely by
> a PTP stack, so it is a little difficult to use when there is a layer of kernel support
> between the application and the driver.
Are you saying that linuxptp is not a PTP stack?
Maybe it would be wiser to design your HW so that it can work under Linux?
Nah, nobody cares about Linux support these days.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists