netdev - Re: [PATCH 5/8] net: ethernet: ibm: ibmvnic: Fix some kernel-doc misdemeanours

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:04:30 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dany Madden <drt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Santiago Leon <santi_leon@...oo.com>,
        Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        John Allen <jallen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] net: ethernet: ibm: ibmvnic: Fix some kernel-doc
 misdemeanours

On Sun, 29 Nov 2020, Andrew Lunn wrote:

> Hi Lee
> 
> >  /**
> >   * build_hdr_data - creates L2/L3/L4 header data buffer
> > - * @hdr_field - bitfield determining needed headers
> > - * @skb - socket buffer
> > - * @hdr_len - array of header lengths
> > - * @tot_len - total length of data
> > + * @hdr_field: bitfield determining needed headers
> > + * @skb: socket buffer
> > + * @hdr_len: array of header lengths
> > + * @tot_len: total length of data
> >   *
> >   * Reads hdr_field to determine which headers are needed by firmware.
> >   * Builds a buffer containing these headers.  Saves individual header
> 
> The code is:
> 
> static int build_hdr_data(u8 hdr_field, struct sk_buff *skb,
>                           int *hdr_len, u8 *hdr_data)
> {
> 
> What about hdr_data? 
> 
> >  /**
> >   * create_hdr_descs - create header and header extension descriptors
> > - * @hdr_field - bitfield determining needed headers
> > - * @data - buffer containing header data
> > - * @len - length of data buffer
> > - * @hdr_len - array of individual header lengths
> > - * @scrq_arr - descriptor array
> > + * @hdr_field: bitfield determining needed headers
> > + * @data: buffer containing header data
> > + * @len: length of data buffer
> > + * @hdr_len: array of individual header lengths
> > + * @scrq_arr: descriptor array
> 
> static int create_hdr_descs(u8 hdr_field, u8 *hdr_data, int len, int *hdr_len,
>                             union sub_crq *scrq_arr)
> 
> There is no data parameter.
> 
> It looks like you just changes - to :, but did not validate the
> parameters are actually correct.

Right.  This is a 'quirk' of my current process.

I build once, then use a script to parse the output, fixing each
issue in the order the compiler presents them.  Then, either after
fixing a reasonable collection, or all issues, I re-run the compile
and fix the next batch (if any).

This patch is only fixing the formatting issue(s).  As you've seen,
there is a subsequent patch in the series which fixes the disparity.

I can squash them though.  No problem.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog