[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201130113927.tyreinlrvrav22zm@lion.mk-sys.cz>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 12:39:27 +0100
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Hangbin Liu <haliu@...hat.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 0/5] iproute2: add libbpf support
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 07:22:54AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 10:16:35PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> > If someone steps up to doing this then I would be happy to merge it now
> > for 5.10. Otherwise it won't show up until 5.11.
>
> Don't ever "rush" anything for a LTS/stable release, otherwise I am
> going to have to go back to the old way of not announcing them until
> _after_ they are released as people throw stuff that is not ready for
> a normal merge.
>
> This looks like a new feature, and shouldn't go in right now in the
> development cycle anyway, all features for 5.10 had to be in linux-next
> before 5.9 was released.
>From the context, I believe Stephen meant merging into iproute2 5.10,
not kernel.
Michal Kubecek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists