[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba9e04b1-1e92-92ef-e4fb-4ae003d78fdc@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 12:50:26 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error
On 11/27/20 11:30 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 11/27/20 10:59 AM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>> Losing arbitration is normal in a CAN-bus network, it means that a
>> higher priority frame is being send and the pending message will be
>> retried later. Hence most driver only increment arbitration_lost, but
>> the sja1000 and sun4i driver also incremeant tx_error, causing errors
>> to be reported on a normal functioning CAN-bus. So stop counting them
>> as errors.
>
> Sounds plausible.
>
>> For completeness, the Kvaser USB hybra also increments the tx_error
>> on arbitration lose, but it does so in single shot. Since in that
>> case the message is not retried, that behaviour is kept.
>
> You mean only in one shot mode? What about one shot mode on the sja1000 cores?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com>
>
> I've split this into two patches, and added Fixes: lines, and pushed this for
> now to linux-can/sja1000.
Added to linux-can/testing
Tnx,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists