netdev - [PATCH 1/2][v3] e1000e: Leverage direct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <b8896b7748e516e9c440ab22e582e30f1389776c.1606757180.git.yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Date:   Tue,  1 Dec 2020 09:21:50 +0800
From:   Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
To:     Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@...el.com>,
        "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Brandt, Todd E" <todd.e.brandt@...el.com>,
        Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2][v3] e1000e: Leverage direct_complete to speed up s2ram

The NIC is put in runtime suspend status when there is no cable connected.
As a result, it is safe to keep non-wakeup NIC in runtime suspended during
s2ram because the system does not rely on the NIC plug event nor WoL to wake
up the system. Besides that, unlike the s2idle, s2ram does not need to
manipulate S0ix settings during suspend.

This patch introduces the .prepare() for e1000e so that if the NIC is runtime
suspended the subsequent suspend/resume hooks will be skipped so as to speed
up the s2ram. The pm core will check whether the NIC is a wake up device so
there's no need to check it again in .prepare(). DPM_FLAG_SMART_PREPARE flag
should be set during probe to ask the pci subsystem to honor the driver's
prepare() result. Besides, the NIC remains runtime suspended after resumed
from s2ram as there is no need to resume it.

Tested on i7-2600K with 82579V NIC
Before the patch:
e1000e 0000:00:19.0: pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x160 returned 0 after 225146 usecs
e1000e 0000:00:19.0: pci_pm_resume+0x0/0x90 returned 0 after 140588 usecs

After the patch:
echo disabled > //sys/devices/pci0000\:00/0000\:00\:19.0/power/wakeup
becomes 0 usecs because the hooks will be skipped.

Suggested-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
---
v2: Added test data and some commit log revise(Paul Menzel)
    Only skip the suspend/resume if the NIC is not a wake up device specified
    by the user(Kai-Heng Feng)
v3: Leverage direct complete mechanism to skip all hooks(Kai-Heng Feng)
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index b30f00891c03..b210bba3f20a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
 #include <linux/aer.h>
 #include <linux/prefetch.h>
+#include <linux/suspend.h>
 
 #include "e1000.h"
 
@@ -6957,6 +6958,12 @@ static int __e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int e1000e_pm_prepare(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return pm_runtime_suspended(dev) &&
+		pm_suspend_via_firmware();
+}
+
 static __maybe_unused int e1000e_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(to_pci_dev(dev));
@@ -7665,7 +7672,7 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 
 	e1000_print_device_info(adapter);
 
-	dev_pm_set_driver_flags(&pdev->dev, DPM_FLAG_NO_DIRECT_COMPLETE);
+	dev_pm_set_driver_flags(&pdev->dev, DPM_FLAG_SMART_PREPARE);
 
 	if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev) && hw->mac.type < e1000_pch_cnp)
 		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
@@ -7890,6 +7897,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, e1000_pci_tbl);
 
 static const struct dev_pm_ops e1000_pm_ops = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+	.prepare	= e1000e_pm_prepare,
 	.suspend	= e1000e_pm_suspend,
 	.resume		= e1000e_pm_resume,
 	.freeze		= e1000e_pm_freeze,
-- 
2.17.1