[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201202140233.GB66958@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:02:33 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Alex Belits <abelits@...vell.com>
Cc: "trix@...hat.com" <trix@...hat.com>,
Prasun Kapoor <pkapoor@...vell.com>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"nitesh@...hat.com" <nitesh@...hat.com>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"mtosatti@...hat.com" <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"frederic@...nel.org" <frederic@...nel.org>,
"leon@...ebranch.com" <leon@...ebranch.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"pauld@...hat.com" <pauld@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] "Task_isolation" mode
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 05:40:49PM +0000, Alex Belits wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 08:36 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> > External Email
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---
> >
> > On 11/23/20 9:42 AM, Alex Belits wrote:
> > > This is an update of task isolation work that was originally done
> > > by
> > > Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com> and maintained by him until
> > > November 2017. It is adapted to the current kernel and cleaned up
> > > to
> > > implement its functionality in a more complete and cleaner manner.
> >
> > I am having problems applying the patchset to today's linux-next.
> >
> > Which kernel should I be using ?
>
> The patches are against Linus' tree, in particular, commit
> a349e4c659609fd20e4beea89e5c4a4038e33a95
Is there any reason to base on that commit in particular?
Generally it's preferred that a series is based on a tag (so either a
release or an -rc kernel), and that the cover letter explains what the
base is. If you can do that in future it'll make the series much easier
to work with.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists