netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: dsa: add Arrow SpeedChips XRS700x driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201202002851.z63jdsfqxdkjb46k@skbuf>
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 02:28:51 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND..." <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: dsa: add Arrow SpeedChips XRS700x
 driver

Hi Jakub,

On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:36:42PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Either way, can we conclude that ndo_get_stats64 is not a replacement
> > for ethtool -S, since the latter is blocking and, if implemented correctly,
> > can return the counters at the time of the call (therefore making sure
> > that anything that happened before the syscall has been accounted into
> > the retrieved values), and the former isn't?
>
> ethtool -S is the best source of consistent, up to date statistics we
> have. It seems silly not to include everything the hardware offers
> there.

To add to this, it would seem odd to me if we took the decision to not
expose MAC-level counters any longer in ethtool. Say the MAC has a counter
named rx_dropped. If we are only exposing this counter in ndo_get_stats64,
then we could hit the scenario where this counter keeps incrementing,
but it is the network stack who increments it, and not the MAC.

dev_get_stats() currently does:
	storage->rx_dropped += (unsigned long)atomic_long_read(&dev->rx_dropped);
	storage->tx_dropped += (unsigned long)atomic_long_read(&dev->tx_dropped);
	storage->rx_nohandler += (unsigned long)atomic_long_read(&dev->rx_nohandler);

thereby clobbering the MAC-provided counter. We would not know if it is
a MAC-level drop or not.