netdev - Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:31:51 +0100
From:   Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com>
To:     Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: don't count arbitration lose as an error

Hello Oliver,

On 12/2/20 5:22 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> [...]
>> Aborting the current transmission in non single shot mode
>> will get you there and incorrectly report the message as
>> transmitted, but that is not implemented afaik.
>
> Ahem, no. If you get there the echo_skb is deleted and the tx_errors 
> counter is increased. Just as it should be.
>
>
>

Ahem, yes. I meant how it is, so it will take the else
without CAN_CTRLMODE_ONE_SHOT being set.
But since that is not implemented, it is not relevant.

Regards,

Jeroen