[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201202112256.59a97b9c@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:22:56 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Davis <tadavis@....gov>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] bonding: fix feature flag setting at init time
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:03:53 -0500 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:53 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:30:53 -0500 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > + if (bond->dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED)
> > > + goto noreg;
> > > +
> > > if (newval->value == BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP)
> > > bond->dev->wanted_features |= BOND_XFRM_FEATURES;
> > > else
> > > bond->dev->wanted_features &= ~BOND_XFRM_FEATURES;
> > > - netdev_change_features(bond->dev);
> > > + netdev_update_features(bond->dev);
> > > +noreg:
> >
> > Why the goto?
>
> Seemed cleaner to prevent an extra level of indentation of the code
> following the goto and before the label, but I'm not that attached to
> it if it's not wanted for coding style reasons.
Yes, please don't use gotos where a normal if statement is sufficient.
If you must avoid the indentation move the code to a helper.
Also - this patch did not apply to net, please make sure you're
developing on the correct base.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists