[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201202211134.GM2324545@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:11:34 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net: macb: fail when there's no PHY
> > So it will access the MDIO bus of the PHY that is attached to the
> > MAC.
>
> If that's the case, wouldn't the ioctl() calls "just work" even when
> only the fixed-phy mdio bus and fake PHY are declared in the device
> tree?
The fixed-link PHY is connected to the MAC. So the IOCTL calls will be
made to the fixed-link fake MDIO bus.
> OK, I think I've got a vague idea of how that would be done.
>
> [When it comes to device-tree stuff, I've learned that "a vague idea"
> is pretty much the best I can manage. Nothing ever works the way I
> think it's going to the first time, but with enough guesses I usually
> get there.]
There are plenty of examples to follow.
e.g. arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-twr.dts
&fec0 {
phy-mode = "rmii";
phy-handle = <ðphy0>;
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_fec0>;
status = "okay";
mdio {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
ethphy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
reg = <0>;
};
ethphy1: ethernet-phy@1 {
reg = <1>;
};
};
};
So one Ethernet controller with an MDIO bus with two PHYs on it. It
has a phy-handle pointing it is own PHY.
&fec1 {
phy-mode = "rmii";
phy-handle = <ðphy1>;
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_fec1>;
status = "okay";
};
A second Ethernet, with phy-handle pointing to the second PHY on the
other controllers MDIO bus.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists