[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201202172728.43f387a3@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:27:28 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-x25@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@...il.com>,
"kiyin尹亮) " <kiyin@...cent.com>,
security@...nel.org, linux-distros@...openwall.org,
"huntchen陈阳) "
<huntchen@...cent.com>,
"dannywang王宇) "
<dannywang@...cent.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net/x25: prevent a couple of overflows
On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 10:27:18 +0100 Martin Schiller wrote:
> On 2020-12-01 16:15, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The .x25_addr[] address comes from the user and is not necessarily
> > NUL terminated. This leads to a couple problems. The first problem is
> > that the strlen() in x25_bind() can read beyond the end of the buffer.
> >
> > The second problem is more subtle and could result in memory
> > corruption.
> > The call tree is:
> > x25_connect()
> > --> x25_write_internal()
> > --> x25_addr_aton()
> >
> > The .x25_addr[] buffers are copied to the "addresses" buffer from
> > x25_write_internal() so it will lead to stack corruption.
> >
> > Verify that the strings are NUL terminated and return -EINVAL if they
> > are not.
> >
> > Reported-by: "kiyin(尹亮)" <kiyin@...cent.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>
> Acked-by: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists