netdev - Re: WARNING in sk_stream_kill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:34:33 +0100
From:   Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        syzbot <syzbot+7b99aafdcc2eedea6178@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING in sk_stream_kill_queues (5)

On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 17:27, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:58 PM Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:40AM -0800, syzbot wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > syzbot found the following issue on:
> > >
> > > HEAD commit:    6147c83f Add linux-next specific files for 20201126
> > > git tree:       linux-next
> > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=117c9679500000
> > > kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=9b91566da897c24f
> > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7b99aafdcc2eedea6178
> > > compiler:       gcc (GCC) 10.1.0-syz 20200507
> > > syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=103bf743500000
> > > C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=167c60c9500000
> > >
> > > The issue was bisected to:
> > >
> > > commit 145cd60fb481328faafba76842aa0fd242e2b163
> > > Author: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
> > > Date:   Tue Nov 24 05:38:44 2020 +0000
> > >
> > >     mm, kfence: insert KFENCE hooks for SLUB
> > >
> > > bisection log:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=13abe5b3500000
> > > final oops:     https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=106be5b3500000
> > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17abe5b3500000
> > >
> > > IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> > > Reported-by: syzbot+7b99aafdcc2eedea6178@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > > Fixes: 145cd60fb481 ("mm, kfence: insert KFENCE hooks for SLUB")
> > >
> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11307 at net/core/stream.c:207 sk_stream_kill_queues+0x3c3/0x530 net/core/stream.c:207
> > [...]
> > > Call Trace:
> > >  inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x1a5/0x490 net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c:885
> > >  __tcp_close+0xd3e/0x1170 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2585
> > >  tcp_close+0x29/0xc0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2597
> > >  inet_release+0x12e/0x280 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:431
> > >  __sock_release+0xcd/0x280 net/socket.c:596
> > >  sock_close+0x18/0x20 net/socket.c:1255
> > >  __fput+0x283/0x920 fs/file_table.c:280
> > >  task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:140
> > >  exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:30 [inline]
> > >  do_exit+0xb89/0x29e0 kernel/exit.c:823
> > >  do_group_exit+0x125/0x310 kernel/exit.c:920
> > >  get_signal+0x3ec/0x2010 kernel/signal.c:2770
> > >  arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x2a8/0x1eb0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:811
> > >  handle_signal_work kernel/entry/common.c:144 [inline]
> > >  exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:168 [inline]
> > >  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x124/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:198
> > >  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x36/0x260 kernel/entry/common.c:275
> > >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> >
> > I've been debugging this and I think enabling KFENCE uncovered that some
> > code is assuming that the following is always true:
> >
> >         ksize(kmalloc(S)) == ksize(kmalloc(S))
> >
>
>
> I do not think we make this assumption.
>
> Each skb tracks the 'truesize' which is populated from __alloc_skb()
> using ksize(allocated head) .
>
> So if ksize() decides to give us random data, it should be still fine,
> because we use ksize(buff) only once at alloc skb time, and record the
> value in skb->truesize
>  (only the socket buffer accounting would be off)

Good, thanks for clarifying. So something else must be off then.

> > but I don't think this assumption can be made (with or without KFENCE).
> >
> > With KFENCE, we actually end up testing no code assumes this, because
> > KFENCE's ksize() always returns the exact size S.
> >
> > I have narrowed it down to sk_wmem_queued becoming <0 in
> > sk_wmem_free_skb().
> >
> > The skb passed to sk_wmem_free_skb() and whose truesize causes
> > sk_wmem_queued to become negative is always allocated in:
> >
> >  | kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x140/0x400 mm/slub.c:2939
> >  | __alloc_skb+0x6d/0x710 net/core/skbuff.c:198
> >  | alloc_skb_fclone include/linux/skbuff.h:1144 [inline]
> >  | sk_stream_alloc_skb+0x109/0xc30 net/ipv4/tcp.c:888
> >  | tso_fragment net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:2124 [inline]
> >  | tcp_write_xmit+0x1dbf/0x5ce0 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:2674
> >  | __tcp_push_pending_frames+0xaa/0x390 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:2866
> >  | tcp_push_pending_frames include/net/tcp.h:1864 [inline]
> >  | tcp_data_snd_check net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5374 [inline]
> >  | tcp_rcv_established+0x8c9/0x1eb0 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5869
> >  | tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x5d1/0x870 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1668
> >  | sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1011 [inline]
> >  | __release_sock+0x134/0x3a0 net/core/sock.c:2523
> >  | release_sock+0x54/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:3053
> >  | sk_wait_data+0x177/0x450 net/core/sock.c:2565
> >  | tcp_recvmsg+0x17ea/0x2aa0 net/ipv4/tcp.c:2181
> >  | inet_recvmsg+0x11b/0x5d0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:848
> >  | sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:885 [inline]
> >  | sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:903 [inline]
> >  | sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:899 [inline]
> >  | ____sys_recvmsg+0x2c4/0x600 net/socket.c:2563
> >  | ___sys_recvmsg+0x127/0x200 net/socket.c:2605
> >  | __sys_recvmsg+0xe2/0x1a0 net/socket.c:2641
> >  | do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
> >  | entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> >
> > I used the code below to add some warnings that helped narrow it down.
> >
> > Does any of this help explain the problem?
>
> Not yet :)

Damn...

> tso_fragment() transfers some payload from one skb to another, and
> properly shifts this amount from src skb to dst skb (@buff) :
>
> sk_wmem_queued_add(sk, buff->truesize);
> buff->truesize += nlen;
> skb->truesize -= nlen;

Any other stacktraces that might help?

Thanks,
-- Marco