netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201203032645.GB1568874@carbon.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 19:26:45 -0800
From:   Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
CC:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory
 accounting

On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 06:54:46PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:59 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
> >
> > 5) Cryptic -EPERM is returned on exceeding the limit. Libbpf even had
> >    a function to "explain" this case for users.
> ...
> > v9:
> >   - always charge the saved memory cgroup, by Daniel, Toke and Alexei
> >   - added bpf_map_kzalloc()
> >   - rebase and minor fixes
> 
> This looks great. Applied.

Thanks!

> Please follow up with a change to libbpf's pr_perm_msg().
> That helpful warning should stay for old kernels, but it would be
> misleading for new kernels.
> libbpf probably needs a feature check to make this warning conditional.

I think we've discussed it several months ago and at that time we didn't
find a good way to check this feature. I'll think again, but if somebody
has any ideas here, I'll appreciate a lot.