[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201202163751.17b6fba2@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 16:37:51 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<toshiaki.makita1@...il.com>, <rkovhaev@...il.com>,
<stephen@...workplumber.org>, <Jason@...c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: fix memory leak in register_netdevice() on
error path
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 21:54:57 +0800 Yang Yingliang wrote:
> I got a memleak report when doing fault-inject test:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff88810ace9000 (size 1024):
> comm "ip", pid 4622, jiffies 4295457037 (age 43.378s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<00000000008abe41>] __kmalloc+0x10f/0x210
> [<000000005d3533a6>] veth_dev_init+0x140/0x310
> [<0000000088353c64>] register_netdevice+0x496/0x7a0
> [<000000001324d322>] veth_newlink+0x40b/0x960
> [<00000000d0799866>] __rtnl_newlink+0xd8c/0x1360
> [<00000000d616040a>] rtnl_newlink+0x6b/0xa0
> [<00000000e0a1600d>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3cc/0x9e0
> [<000000009eeff98b>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x130/0x3a0
> [<00000000500f8be1>] netlink_unicast+0x4da/0x700
> [<00000000666c03b3>] netlink_sendmsg+0x7fe/0xcb0
> [<0000000073b28103>] sock_sendmsg+0x143/0x180
> [<00000000ad746a30>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x677/0x810
> [<0000000087dd98e5>] ___sys_sendmsg+0x105/0x180
> [<00000000028dd365>] __sys_sendmsg+0xf0/0x1c0
> [<00000000a6bfbae6>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
> [<00000000e00521b4>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>
> It seems ifb and loopback may also hit the leak, so I try to fix this in
> register_netdevice().
>
> In common case, priv_destructor() will be called in netdev_run_todo()
> after calling ndo_uninit() in rollback_registered(), on other error
> path in register_netdevice(), ndo_uninit() and priv_destructor() are
> called before register_netdevice() return, but in this case,
> priv_destructor() will never be called, then it causes memory leak,
> so we should call priv_destructor() here.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
> ---
> v2 -> v3: In wireguard driver, priv_destructor() will call
> free_netdev(), but it is assigned after register_netdevice(),
> so it will not lead a double free, drop patch#1. Also I've
> test wireguard device, it's no memory leak on this error path.
Sorry I don't want to apply yet another wobbly workaround to this path.
I started hacking on a rework of the registration / free which will
solve this and all the other corner cases which are broken around here.
Stay tuned.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists