[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201204150005.GM1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:00:05 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: sfp: VSOL V2801F / CarlitoxxPro
CPGOS03-0490 v2.0 workaround
... and I just got another email from Pali Rohár about an hour after
giving me a Tested-by for this patch, saying...
Just to note I applied following fixup change to your patches for
fixing compile errors, there is missing "struct" keyword...
So, v2 on its way.
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 02:35:22PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> Add a workaround for the detection of VSOL V2801F / CarlitoxxPro
> CPGOS03-0490 v2.0 GPON module which CarlitoxxPro states needs single
> byte I2C reads to the EEPROM.
>
> Pali Rohár reports that he also has a CarlitoxxPro-based V2801F module,
> which reports a manufacturer of "OEM". This manufacturer can't be
> matched as it appears in many different modules, so also match the part
> number too.
>
> Reported-by: Thomas Schreiber <tschreibe@...il.com>
> Reported-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
> Tested-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> index 34aa196b7465..0b26495973ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> @@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ struct sfp {
> struct sfp_bus *sfp_bus;
> struct phy_device *mod_phy;
> const struct sff_data *type;
> + size_t i2c_block_size;
> u32 max_power_mW;
>
> unsigned int (*get_state)(struct sfp *);
> @@ -335,10 +336,19 @@ static int sfp_i2c_read(struct sfp *sfp, bool a2, u8 dev_addr, void *buf,
> size_t len)
> {
> struct i2c_msg msgs[2];
> - u8 bus_addr = a2 ? 0x51 : 0x50;
> + size_t block_size;
> size_t this_len;
> + u8 bus_addr;
> int ret;
>
> + if (a2) {
> + block_size = 16;
> + bus_addr = 0x51;
> + } else {
> + block_size = sfp->i2c_block_size;
> + bus_addr = 0x50;
> + }
> +
> msgs[0].addr = bus_addr;
> msgs[0].flags = 0;
> msgs[0].len = 1;
> @@ -350,8 +360,8 @@ static int sfp_i2c_read(struct sfp *sfp, bool a2, u8 dev_addr, void *buf,
>
> while (len) {
> this_len = len;
> - if (this_len > 16)
> - this_len = 16;
> + if (this_len > block_size)
> + this_len = block_size;
>
> msgs[1].len = this_len;
>
> @@ -1632,6 +1642,28 @@ static int sfp_sm_mod_hpower(struct sfp *sfp, bool enable)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Some modules (Nokia 3FE46541AA) lock up if byte 0x51 is read as a
> + * single read. Switch back to reading 16 byte blocks unless we have
> + * a CarlitoxxPro module (rebranded VSOL V2801F). Even more annoyingly,
> + * some VSOL V2801F have the vendor name changed to OEM.
> + */
> +static int sfp_quirk_i2c_block_size(const sfp_eeprom_base *base)
> +{
> + if (!memcmp(base->vendor_name, "VSOL ", 16))
> + return 1;
> + if (!memcmp(base->vendor_name, "OEM ", 16) &&
> + !memcmp(base->vendor_pn, "V2801F ", 16))
> + return 1;
> +
> + /* Some modules can't cope with long reads */
> + return 16;
> +}
> +
> +static void sfp_quirks_base(struct sfp *sfp, const sfp_eeprom_base *base)
> +{
> + sfp->i2c_block_size = sfp_quirk_i2c_block_size(base);
> +}
> +
> static int sfp_cotsworks_fixup_check(struct sfp *sfp, struct sfp_eeprom_id *id)
> {
> u8 check;
> @@ -1673,14 +1705,20 @@ static int sfp_sm_mod_probe(struct sfp *sfp, bool report)
> u8 check;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = sfp_read(sfp, false, 0, &id, sizeof(id));
> + /* Some modules (CarlitoxxPro CPGOS03-0490) do not support multibyte
> + * reads from the EEPROM, so start by reading the base identifying
> + * information one byte at a time.
> + */
> + sfp->i2c_block_size = 1;
> +
> + ret = sfp_read(sfp, false, 0, &id.base, sizeof(id.base));
> if (ret < 0) {
> if (report)
> dev_err(sfp->dev, "failed to read EEPROM: %d\n", ret);
> return -EAGAIN;
> }
>
> - if (ret != sizeof(id)) {
> + if (ret != sizeof(id.base)) {
> dev_err(sfp->dev, "EEPROM short read: %d\n", ret);
> return -EAGAIN;
> }
> @@ -1719,6 +1757,21 @@ static int sfp_sm_mod_probe(struct sfp *sfp, bool report)
> }
> }
>
> + /* Apply any early module-specific quirks */
> + sfp_quirks_base(sfp, &id.base);
> +
> + ret = sfp_read(sfp, false, SFP_CC_BASE + 1, &id.ext, sizeof(id.ext));
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + if (report)
> + dev_err(sfp->dev, "failed to read EEPROM: %d\n", ret);
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret != sizeof(id.ext)) {
> + dev_err(sfp->dev, "EEPROM short read: %d\n", ret);
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> +
> check = sfp_check(&id.ext, sizeof(id.ext) - 1);
> if (check != id.ext.cc_ext) {
> if (cotsworks) {
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists