netdev - Re: [PATCH] enetc: fix build warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Dec 2020 08:51:50 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.cionei@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>, Po Liu <po.liu@....com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] enetc: fix build warning

On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 12:18:16 +0000 Claudiu Manoil wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> >Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 12:37 AM  
> [...]
> >Subject: [PATCH] enetc: fix build warning
> >
> >From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >
> >When CONFIG_OF is disabled, there is a harmless warning about
> >an unused variable:
> >
> >enetc_pf.c: In function 'enetc_phylink_create':
> >enetc_pf.c:981:17: error: unused variable 'dev' [-Werror=unused-variable]
> >
> >Slightly rearrange the code to pass around the of_node as a
> >function argument, which avoids the problem without hurting
> >readability.
> >
> >Fixes: 71b77a7a27a3 ("enetc: Migrate to PHYLINK and PCS_LYNX")
> >Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>  
> 
> Very nice cleanup, the code looks much better like this.
> For some reason this patch is marked as "Not applicable" in patchwork.
> So I took the patch, made a small cosmetic change (see nit below), added a more
> verbose subject line, tested and resent it, patchwork link here:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20201204120800.17193-1-claudiu.manoil@nxp.com/

We switched to a different PW instance:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20201203223747.1337389-1-arnd@kernel.org/

> >---
> > .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.c   | 21 +++++++++----------
> >@@ -1005,9 +1003,10 @@ static int enetc_pf_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > 	struct net_device *ndev;
> > 	struct enetc_si *si;
> > 	struct enetc_pf *pf;
> >+	struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;  
> 
> Nit: move this long line to the top (reverse tree)

Now it's gonna get marked as changes requested ;)