[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201204092012.720b53bf@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 09:20:12 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: alardam@...il.com
Cc: magnus.karlsson@...el.com, bjorn.topel@...el.com,
andrii.nakryiko@...il.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
john.fastabend@...il.com, hawk@...nel.org, toke@...hat.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, jonathan.lemon@...il.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Marek Majtyka <marekx.majtyka@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 0/5] New netdev feature flags for XDP
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:28:56 +0100 alardam@...il.com wrote:
> * Extend ethtool netlink interface in order to get access to the XDP
> bitmap (XDP_PROPERTIES_GET). [Toke]
That's a good direction, but I don't see why XDP caps belong in ethtool
at all? We use rtnetlink to manage the progs...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists