netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] bcm63xx_enet: batch process rx path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:24:26 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Sieng Piaw Liew <liew.s.piaw@...il.com>
Cc:     bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bcm63xx_enet: batch process rx path



On 12/3/2020 9:46 PM, Sieng Piaw Liew wrote:
> Use netif_receive_skb_list to batch process rx skb.
> Tested on BCM6328 320 MHz using iperf3 -M 512, increasing performance
> by 12.5%.
> 
> Before:
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
> [  4]   0.00-30.00  sec   120 MBytes  33.7 Mbits/sec  277         sender
> [  4]   0.00-30.00  sec   120 MBytes  33.5 Mbits/sec            receiver
> 
> After:
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Retr
> [  4]   0.00-30.00  sec   136 MBytes  37.9 Mbits/sec  203         sender
> [  4]   0.00-30.00  sec   135 MBytes  37.7 Mbits/sec            receiver
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sieng Piaw Liew <liew.s.piaw@...il.com>

Your patches are all dependent on one another and part of a series to
please have a cover letter and order them so they can be applied in the
correct order, after you address Eric's feedback. Thank you
-- 
Florian