netdev - Re: [PATCH] dpaa_eth: fix build errorr in dpaa_fq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201204102752.4bfac75d@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Dec 2020 10:27:52 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
Cc:     Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, madalin.bucur@....com,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dpaa_eth: fix build errorr in dpaa_fq_init

On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:49:21 +0100 Björn Töpel wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 15:46, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > When building FSL_DPAA_ETH the following build error shows up:
> >
> > /tmp/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c: In function ‘dpaa_fq_init’:
> > /tmp/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c:1135:9: error: too few arguments to function ‘xdp_rxq_info_reg’
> >  1135 |   err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&dpaa_fq->xdp_rxq, dpaa_fq->net_dev,
> >       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Commit b02e5a0ebb17 ("xsk: Propagate napi_id to XDP socket Rx path")
> > added an extra argument to function xdp_rxq_info_reg and commit
> > d57e57d0cd04 ("dpaa_eth: add XDP_TX support") didn't know about that
> > extra argument.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >
> > I think this issue is seen since both patches went in at the same time
> > to bpf-next and net-next.
> >  
> 
> Thanks Anders!
> 
> Indeed, when bpf-next is pulled into net-next this needs to be applied.
> 
> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>

Applied, thanks!

Looks like there is a mention of this function in an
example in Documentation/ that may need updating, too.