[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0Ucz5zDp3fEJFpt1x1e+OcLCxOZVyo5KK5sM_LktbLQH3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 13:25:50 -0800
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@...l.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Sasha Netfin <sasha.neftin@...el.com>,
Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>,
Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Arcari <darcari@...hat.com>,
Yijun Shen <Yijun.Shen@...l.com>, Perry.Yuan@...l.com,
anthony.wong@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] e1000e: Move all S0ix related code into its own
source file
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:09 PM Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@...l.com> wrote:
>
> Introduce a flag to indicate the device should be using the S0ix
> flows and use this flag to run those functions.
>
> Splitting the code to it's own file will make future heuristics
> more self contained.
>
> Tested-by: Yijun Shen <yijun.shen@...l.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@...l.com>
One minor issue pointed out below.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h | 4 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 272 +-------------------
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/s0ix.c | 280 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 290 insertions(+), 268 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/s0ix.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/Makefile b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/Makefile
> index 44e58b6e7660..f2332c01f86c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/Makefile
> @@ -9,5 +9,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_E1000E) += e1000e.o
>
> e1000e-objs := 82571.o ich8lan.o 80003es2lan.o \
> mac.o manage.o nvm.o phy.o \
> - param.o ethtool.o netdev.o ptp.o
> + param.o ethtool.o netdev.o s0ix.o ptp.o
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> index ba7a0f8f6937..b13f956285ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> @@ -436,6 +436,7 @@ s32 e1000e_get_base_timinca(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u32 *timinca);
> #define FLAG2_DFLT_CRC_STRIPPING BIT(12)
> #define FLAG2_CHECK_RX_HWTSTAMP BIT(13)
> #define FLAG2_CHECK_SYSTIM_OVERFLOW BIT(14)
> +#define FLAG2_ENABLE_S0IX_FLOWS BIT(15)
>
> #define E1000_RX_DESC_PS(R, i) \
> (&(((union e1000_rx_desc_packet_split *)((R).desc))[i]))
> @@ -462,6 +463,9 @@ enum latency_range {
> extern char e1000e_driver_name[];
>
> void e1000e_check_options(struct e1000_adapter *adapter);
> +void e1000e_s0ix_entry_flow(struct e1000_adapter *adapter);
> +void e1000e_s0ix_exit_flow(struct e1000_adapter *adapter);
> +void e1000e_maybe_enable_s0ix(struct e1000_adapter *adapter);
> void e1000e_set_ethtool_ops(struct net_device *netdev);
>
> int e1000e_open(struct net_device *netdev);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index 128ab6898070..cd9839e86615 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
<snip>
> static int e1000e_pm_freeze(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct net_device *netdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> @@ -6962,7 +6701,6 @@ static __maybe_unused int e1000e_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(to_pci_dev(dev));
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> - struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> int rc;
>
> e1000e_flush_lpic(pdev);
> @@ -6974,8 +6712,7 @@ static __maybe_unused int e1000e_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> e1000e_pm_thaw(dev);
>
> /* Introduce S0ix implementation */
> - if (hw->mac.type >= e1000_pch_cnp &&
> - !e1000e_check_me(hw->adapter->pdev->device))
> + if (adapter->flags2 & FLAG2_ENABLE_S0IX_FLOWS)
> e1000e_s0ix_entry_flow(adapter);
So the placement of this code raises some issues. It isn't a problem
with your patch but a bug in the driver that needs to be addressed. I
am assuming you only need to perform this flow if you successfully
froze the part. However this is doing it in all cases, which is why
the e1000e_pm_thaw is being called before you call this code. This is
something that should probably be an "else if" rather than a seperate
if statement.
>
> return rc;
> @@ -6986,12 +6723,10 @@ static __maybe_unused int e1000e_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
> struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(to_pci_dev(dev));
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> - struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> int rc;
>
> /* Introduce S0ix implementation */
> - if (hw->mac.type >= e1000_pch_cnp &&
> - !e1000e_check_me(hw->adapter->pdev->device))
> + if (adapter->flags2 & FLAG2_ENABLE_S0IX_FLOWS)
> e1000e_s0ix_exit_flow(adapter);
>
> rc = __e1000_resume(pdev);
> @@ -7655,6 +7390,9 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> if (!(adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_AMT))
> e1000e_get_hw_control(adapter);
>
> + /* use heuristics to decide whether to enable s0ix flows */
> + e1000e_maybe_enable_s0ix(adapter);
> +
> strlcpy(netdev->name, "eth%d", sizeof(netdev->name));
> err = register_netdev(netdev);
> if (err)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists