lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 3 Dec 2020 20:04:41 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com,
        j.vosburgh@...il.com, vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/4] net: dsa: Link aggregation support



On 12/2/2020 1:13 AM, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> Monitor the following events and notify the driver when:
> 
> - A DSA port joins/leaves a LAG.
> - A LAG, made up of DSA ports, joins/leaves a bridge.
> - A DSA port in a LAG is enabled/disabled (enabled meaning
>   "distributing" in 802.3ad LACP terms).
> 
> Each LAG interface to which a DSA port is attached is represented by a
> `struct dsa_lag` which is globally reachable from the switch tree and
> from each associated port.
> 
> When a LAG joins a bridge, the DSA subsystem will treat that as each
> individual port joining the bridge. The driver may look at the port's
> LAG pointer to see if it is associated with any LAG, if that is
> required. This is analogue to how switchdev events are replicated out
> to all lower devices when reaching e.g. a LAG.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>

Vladimir and Andrew have already spotted what I was going to comment on,
just a few suggestions below:
[snip]

> +struct dsa_lag {
> +	struct net_device *dev;
> +	int id;

unsigned int?

> +
> +	struct list_head ports;
> +
> +	/* For multichip systems, we must ensure that each hash bucket
> +	 * is only enabled on a single egress port throughout the
> +	 * whole tree, lest we send duplicates. Therefore we must
> +	 * maintain a global list of active tx ports, so that each
> +	 * switch can figure out which buckets to enable on which
> +	 * ports.
> +	 */
> +	struct list_head tx_ports;
> +	int num_tx;

unsigned int?

Which if you change the type would require you to also change the types
of some iterators you used.
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists