lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 5 Dec 2020 13:27:16 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
Cc:     Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] ethernet: ucc_geth: assorted fixes and
 simplifications

On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 22:11:39 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > Looks like a nice clean up on a quick look.
> > 
> > Please separate patches 1 and 11 (which are the two bug fixes I see)  
> 
> I think patch 2 is a bug fix as well, but I'd like someone from NXP to
> comment.

Sure, makes sense.

> > rebase (retest) and post them against the net tree:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/  
> 
> So I thought this would go through Li Yang's tree. That's where my
> previous QE related patches have gone through, and at least some need
> some input from NXP folks - and what MAINTAINERS suggests. So not
> marking the patches with net or net-next was deliberate. But I'm happy
> to rearrange and send to net/net-next as appropriate if that's what you
> and Li Yang can agree to.

Ah, now I noticed you didn't CC all of the patches to netdev.
Please don't do that, build bots won't be able to validate partially
posted patches.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists