lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 5 Dec 2020 22:36:38 +0100
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <>
Cc:     Li Yang <>,
        "David S. Miller" <>,
        Qiang Zhao <>,,,,,
        Vladimir Oltean <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] ethernet: ucc_geth: assorted fixes and

On 05/12/2020 22.27, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 22:11:39 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>>> rebase (retest) and post them against the net tree:
>> So I thought this would go through Li Yang's tree. That's where my
>> previous QE related patches have gone through, and at least some need
>> some input from NXP folks - and what MAINTAINERS suggests. So not
>> marking the patches with net or net-next was deliberate. But I'm happy
>> to rearrange and send to net/net-next as appropriate if that's what you
>> and Li Yang can agree to.
> Ah, now I noticed you didn't CC all of the patches to netdev.
> Please don't do that, build bots won't be able to validate partially
> posted patches.

Hm, I mostly rely on scripts/, invoked via a script I
give to --to-cmd/--cc-cmd. They are all sent to LKML, so buildbots
should be OK. But regardless of whether Li Yang will be handling it or
not, I'll try to remember to cc the whole series to netdev when resending.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists