[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ce190c0-53c1-fa45-0e7d-45ed7913b076@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 21:51:55 +0200
From: "Paraschiv, Andra-Irina" <andraprs@...zon.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Duncan <davdunc@...zon.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.de>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] af_vsock: Assign the vsock transport
considering the vsock address flags
On 07/12/2020 12:00, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 07:02:35PM +0200, Andra Paraschiv wrote:
>> The vsock flags field can be set in the connect and (listen) receive
>> paths.
>>
>> When the vsock transport is assigned, the remote CID is used to
>> distinguish between types of connection.
>>
>> Use the vsock flags value (in addition to the CID) from the remote
>> address to decide which vsock transport to assign. For the sibling VMs
>> use case, all the vsock packets need to be forwarded to the host, so
>> always assign the guest->host transport if the VMADDR_FLAG_TO_HOST flag
>> is set. For the other use cases, the vsock transport assignment logic is
>> not changed.
>>
>> Changelog
>>
>> v1 -> v2
>>
>> * Use bitwise operator to check the vsock flag.
>> * Use the updated "VMADDR_FLAG_TO_HOST" flag naming.
>> * Merge the checks for the g2h transport assignment in one "if" block.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@...zon.com>
>> ---
>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 9 +++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> index 83d035eab0b05..66e643c3b5f85 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> @@ -421,7 +421,8 @@ static void vsock_deassign_transport(struct
>> vsock_sock *vsk)
>> * The vsk->remote_addr is used to decide which transport to use:
>> * - remote CID == VMADDR_CID_LOCAL or g2h->local_cid or
>> VMADDR_CID_HOST if
>> * g2h is not loaded, will use local transport;
>> - * - remote CID <= VMADDR_CID_HOST will use guest->host transport;
>> + * - remote CID <= VMADDR_CID_HOST or h2g is not loaded or remote
>> flags field
>> + * includes VMADDR_FLAG_TO_HOST flag value, will use guest->host
>> transport;
>> * - remote CID > VMADDR_CID_HOST will use host->guest transport;
>> */
>> int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock
>> *psk)
>> @@ -429,6 +430,7 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock
>> *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
>> const struct vsock_transport *new_transport;
>> struct sock *sk = sk_vsock(vsk);
>> unsigned int remote_cid = vsk->remote_addr.svm_cid;
>> + unsigned short remote_flags;
>> int ret;
>>
>> /* If the packet is coming with the source and destination CIDs
>> higher
>> @@ -443,6 +445,8 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock
>> *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
>> vsk->remote_addr.svm_cid > VMADDR_CID_HOST)
>> vsk->remote_addr.svm_flags |= VMADDR_FLAG_TO_HOST;
>>
>> + remote_flags = vsk->remote_addr.svm_flags;
>> +
>> switch (sk->sk_type) {
>> case SOCK_DGRAM:
>> new_transport = transport_dgram;
>> @@ -450,7 +454,8 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock
>> *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
>> case SOCK_STREAM:
>> if (vsock_use_local_transport(remote_cid))
>> new_transport = transport_local;
>> - else if (remote_cid <= VMADDR_CID_HOST || !transport_h2g)
>> + else if (remote_cid <= VMADDR_CID_HOST ||
>> !transport_h2g ||
>> + (remote_flags & VMADDR_FLAG_TO_HOST) ==
>> VMADDR_FLAG_TO_HOST)
>
> Maybe "remote_flags & VMADDR_FLAG_TO_HOST" should be enough, but the
> patch is okay:
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Done, updated to have only the bitwise logic, without the comparison.
Thanks,
Andra
>
>> new_transport = transport_g2h;
>> else
>> new_transport = transport_h2g;
>> --
>> 2.20.1 (Apple Git-117)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Amazon Development Center (Romania) S.R.L. registered office: 27A Sf.
>> Lazar Street, UBC5, floor 2, Iasi, Iasi County, 700045, Romania.
>> Registered in Romania. Registration number J22/2621/2005.
>>
>
Amazon Development Center (Romania) S.R.L. registered office: 27A Sf. Lazar Street, UBC5, floor 2, Iasi, Iasi County, 700045, Romania. Registered in Romania. Registration number J22/2621/2005.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists