netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: avoid overflows involving hash elem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <160738140673.13800.6309279331247475101.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 07 Dec 2020 22:50:06 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller@...glegroups.com, guro@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: avoid overflows involving hash elem_size

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Mon,  7 Dec 2020 10:28:21 -0800 you wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> Use of bpf_map_charge_init() was making sure hash tables would not use more
> than 4GB of memory.
> 
> Since the implicit check disappeared, we have to be more careful
> about overflows, to support big hash tables.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf: avoid overflows involving hash elem_size
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e1868b9e36d0

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html