netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 6/9] igc: Add support for tuning frame preemption via ethtool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201207152207.0c0d6edd@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Dec 2020 15:22:07 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        jiri@...nulli.us, m-karicheri2@...com, vladimir.oltean@....com,
        Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com, po.liu@....com,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 6/9] igc: Add support for tuning frame
 preemption via ethtool

On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:15:25 -0800 Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> > WARNING: 'PREEMPTABLE' may be misspelled - perhaps 'PREEMPTIBLE'?  
> 
> In the datasheet the term PREEMPTABLE is used, and when refering to
> register values I chose to be consistent with the datasheet. But as the
> margin for confusion is small, I can change to use "preemptible"
> everywhere, no problem.

If there is a reason to it feel free to keep as is.