[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tusx6cvl.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:04:30 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: alardam@...il.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
bjorn.topel@...el.com, andrii.nakryiko@...il.com, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
john.fastabend@...il.com, hawk@...nel.org,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, jonathan.lemon@...il.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Marek Majtyka <marekx.majtyka@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 0/5] New netdev feature flags for XDP
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:
> On Fri, 04 Dec 2020 18:26:10 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:28:56 +0100 alardam@...il.com wrote:
>> >> * Extend ethtool netlink interface in order to get access to the XDP
>> >> bitmap (XDP_PROPERTIES_GET). [Toke]
>> >
>> > That's a good direction, but I don't see why XDP caps belong in ethtool
>> > at all? We use rtnetlink to manage the progs...
>>
>> You normally use ethtool to get all the other features a device support,
>> don't you?
>
> Not really, please take a look at all the IFLA attributes. There's
> a bunch of capabilities there.
Ah, right, TIL. Well, putting this new property in rtnetlink instead of
ethtool is fine by me as well :)
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists