lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:04:30 +0100 From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: alardam@...il.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com, bjorn.topel@...el.com, andrii.nakryiko@...il.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, hawk@...nel.org, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, jonathan.lemon@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, Marek Majtyka <marekx.majtyka@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 0/5] New netdev feature flags for XDP Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes: > On Fri, 04 Dec 2020 18:26:10 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: >> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes: >> >> > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:28:56 +0100 alardam@...il.com wrote: >> >> * Extend ethtool netlink interface in order to get access to the XDP >> >> bitmap (XDP_PROPERTIES_GET). [Toke] >> > >> > That's a good direction, but I don't see why XDP caps belong in ethtool >> > at all? We use rtnetlink to manage the progs... >> >> You normally use ethtool to get all the other features a device support, >> don't you? > > Not really, please take a look at all the IFLA attributes. There's > a bunch of capabilities there. Ah, right, TIL. Well, putting this new property in rtnetlink instead of ethtool is fine by me as well :) -Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists