[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <752c8838-b478-43da-620b-e15bcc690518@hartkopp.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:54:28 +0100
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Wagner <thwa1@....de>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [net 3/3] can: isotp: add SF_BROADCAST support for functional
addressing
On 05.12.20 22:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 21:56:33 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 12/5/20 9:33 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>>> What about the (incremental?) change that Thomas Wagner posted?
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201204135557.55599-1-thwa1@web.de
>>>
>>> That settles it :) This change needs to got into -next and 5.11.
>>
>> Ok. Can you take patch 1, which is a real fix:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20201204133508.742120-2-mkl@pengutronix.de/
>
> Sure! Applied that one from the ML (I assumed that's what you meant).
>
I just double-checked this mail and in fact the second patch from Marc's
pull request was a real fix too:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20201204133508.742120-3-mkl@pengutronix.de/
Btw. the missing feature which was added for completeness of the ISOTP
implementation has now also integrated the improvement suggested by
Thomas Wagner:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/20201206144731.4609-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net/T/#u
Would be cool if it could go into the initial iso-tp contribution as
5.10 becomes a long-term kernel.
But I don't want to be pushy - treat it as your like.
Many thanks,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists