[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201208235332.354826-1-andrii@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:53:32 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
To: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...com>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>
CC: <andrii@...nel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] libbpf: support module BTF for BPF_TYPE_ID_TARGET CO-RE relocation
When Clang emits ldimm64 instruction for BPF_TYPE_ID_TARGET CO-RE relocation,
put module BTF FD, containing target type, into upper 32 bits of imm64.
Because this FD is internal to libbpf, it's very cumbersome to test this in
selftests. Manual testing was performed with debug log messages sprinkled
across selftests and libbpf, confirming expected values are substituted.
Better testing will be performed as part of the work adding module BTF types
support to bpf_snprintf_btf() helpers.
v1->v2:
- fix crash on failing to resolve target spec (Alan).
Cc: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 9be88a90a4aa..2fb9824bf9bf 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -4795,6 +4795,7 @@ static int load_module_btfs(struct bpf_object *obj)
mod_btf = &obj->btf_modules[obj->btf_module_cnt++];
+ btf__set_fd(btf, fd);
mod_btf->btf = btf;
mod_btf->id = id;
mod_btf->fd = fd;
@@ -5445,6 +5446,10 @@ struct bpf_core_relo_res
__u32 orig_type_id;
__u32 new_sz;
__u32 new_type_id;
+ /* FD of the module BTF containing the target candidate, or 0 for
+ * vmlinux BTF
+ */
+ int btf_obj_fd;
};
/* Calculate original and target relocation values, given local and target
@@ -5469,6 +5474,7 @@ static int bpf_core_calc_relo(const struct bpf_program *prog,
res->fail_memsz_adjust = false;
res->orig_sz = res->new_sz = 0;
res->orig_type_id = res->new_type_id = 0;
+ res->btf_obj_fd = 0;
if (core_relo_is_field_based(relo->kind)) {
err = bpf_core_calc_field_relo(prog, relo, local_spec,
@@ -5519,6 +5525,9 @@ static int bpf_core_calc_relo(const struct bpf_program *prog,
} else if (core_relo_is_type_based(relo->kind)) {
err = bpf_core_calc_type_relo(relo, local_spec, &res->orig_val);
err = err ?: bpf_core_calc_type_relo(relo, targ_spec, &res->new_val);
+ if (!err && relo->kind == BPF_TYPE_ID_TARGET &&
+ targ_spec && targ_spec->btf != prog->obj->btf_vmlinux)
+ res->btf_obj_fd = btf__fd(targ_spec->btf);
} else if (core_relo_is_enumval_based(relo->kind)) {
err = bpf_core_calc_enumval_relo(relo, local_spec, &res->orig_val);
err = err ?: bpf_core_calc_enumval_relo(relo, targ_spec, &res->new_val);
@@ -5725,10 +5734,14 @@ static int bpf_core_patch_insn(struct bpf_program *prog,
}
insn[0].imm = new_val;
- insn[1].imm = 0; /* currently only 32-bit values are supported */
- pr_debug("prog '%s': relo #%d: patched insn #%d (LDIMM64) imm64 %llu -> %u\n",
+ /* btf_obj_fd is zero for all relos but BPF_TYPE_ID_TARGET
+ * with target type in the kernel module BTF
+ */
+ insn[1].imm = res->btf_obj_fd;
+ pr_debug("prog '%s': relo #%d: patched insn #%d (LDIMM64) imm64 %llu -> %llu\n",
prog->name, relo_idx, insn_idx,
- (unsigned long long)imm, new_val);
+ (unsigned long long)imm,
+ ((unsigned long long)res->btf_obj_fd << 32) | new_val);
break;
}
default:
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists