lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 06:17:35 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: macb: should we revert 0a4e9ce17ba7 ("macb: support the two tx descriptors on at91rm9200") ? On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 03:40:42PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Thanks for the report, I remember that one. In hindsight maybe we > should have punted it to 5.11... Well, not necessarily as it was simple, well documented and *appeared* to work fine. > Let's revert ASAP, 5.10 is going to be LTS, people will definitely > notice. It could take some time as we're speaking about crazy people running 5.10 on an old 180 MHz MCU :-) > Would you mind sending a revert patch with the explanation in the > commit message? Sure, will do. Thanks! Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists