[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201210085321.18693-1-a@unstable.cc>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:53:21 +0100
From: Antonio Quartulli <a@...table.cc>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Antonio Quartulli <a@...table.cc>
Subject: [PATCH] can: avoid double unlikely() notation when using IS_ERR()
The definition of IS_ERR() already applies the unlikely() notation
when checking the error status of the passed pointer. For this
reason there is no need to have the same notation outside of
IS_ERR() itself.
Clean up code by removing redundant notation.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <a@...table.cc>
---
drivers/net/can/rx-offload.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rx-offload.c b/drivers/net/can/rx-offload.c
index 450c5cfcb3fc..3c1912c0430b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rx-offload.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rx-offload.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ can_rx_offload_offload_one(struct can_rx_offload *offload, unsigned int n)
/* There was a problem reading the mailbox, propagate
* error value.
*/
- if (unlikely(IS_ERR(skb))) {
+ if (IS_ERR(skb)) {
offload->dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
offload->dev->stats.rx_fifo_errors++;
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists