[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ft4di4t8.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 01:06:59 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@...el.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@...il.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>, linux-ntb@...glegroups.com,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Karthikeyan Mitran <m.karthikeyan@...iveil.co.in>,
Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 27/30] xen/events: Only force affinity mask for percpu interrupts
On Thu, Dec 10 2020 at 18:20, boris ostrovsky wrote:
> On 12/10/20 2:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> All event channel setups bind the interrupt on CPU0 or the target CPU for
>> percpu interrupts and overwrite the affinity mask with the corresponding
>> cpumask. That does not make sense.
>>
>> The XEN implementation of irqchip::irq_set_affinity() already picks a
>> single target CPU out of the affinity mask and the actual target is stored
>> in the effective CPU mask, so destroying the user chosen affinity mask
>> which might contain more than one CPU is wrong.
>>
>> Change the implementation so that the channel is bound to CPU0 at the XEN
>> level and leave the affinity mask alone. At startup of the interrupt
>> affinity will be assigned out of the affinity mask and the XEN binding will
>> be updated.
>
> If that's the case then I wonder whether we need this call at all and
> instead bind at startup time.
I was wondering about that, but my knowledge about the Xen internal
requirements is pretty limited. The current set at least survived basic
testing by Jürgen.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists