lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 10:39:32 +0200 From: Yonatan Linik <yonatanlinik@...il.com> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, john.ogness@...utronix.de, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>, Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>, orcohen@...oaltonetworks.com, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: Fix use of proc_fs On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:00 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote: > > Another option would be to just ignore the return code here > and continue without a procfs file, regardless of whether procfs > is enabled or not. > > Arnd Yes I thought about that, but I didn't want to make changes to the way it behaved when procfs was enabled. If you decide that's a better solution I will happily change it. -- Yonatan Linik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists