[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 12:25:54 +0100
From: Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>
To: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...rbonn.se>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/12] gtp: netlink update for ipv6
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 01:26:11PM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> This patch adds the netlink changes required to support IPv6.
See my related comment to the other IPv6 patch in this series.
It is not legal to assume that v4/v6 are an either-or decision,
but it can be either v4-only, v6-only or v4 and v6 in the same PDP context.
For the "peer" (outer) address, I think it is correct to assume only either v4 or v6.
But for the inner "ms" address, it is not.
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists