[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=UzRTkh6bcNSjE-kSgBJYX12+zQUYphZ1GcY-7kNxaLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 16:27:14 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Compiler Attributes: remove CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 4:16 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Because if you get a report of something breaking for your change, you
> need to work to resolve it, not argue about it. Otherwise it needs to
> be dropped/reverted.
Nobody has argued that. In fact, I explicitly said the opposite: "So I
think we can fix them as they come.".
I am expecting Masahiro to follow up. It has been less than 24 hours
since the report, on a weekend.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists