[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201212172017.14b2cca6@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 17:20:17 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] use __netdev_notify_peers in hyperv
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 00:18:11 -0600 Lijun Pan wrote:
> Start to use the lockless version of netdev_notify_peers.
>
> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> index d17bbc75f5e7..4e3dac7bb944 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
> @@ -2130,10 +2130,10 @@ static void netvsc_link_change(struct work_struct *w)
> break;
> }
>
> - rtnl_unlock();
> -
> if (notify)
> - netdev_notify_peers(net);
> + __netdev_notify_peers(net);
> +
> + rtnl_unlock();
Looks like this code is only using this "notify" variable because it
wanted to wait until unlock to call the function. I think you can now
just call the helper where notify used to be set to true.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists