[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bza1tAnAMVw8g4z2UviYqWxgarOXZX2JDTShYyk-NLAo6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:28:57 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch bpf-next v2 0/5] bpf: introduce timeout map
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:13 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
>
> This patchset introduces a new bpf hash map which has timeout.
It's a bit too short a cover letter for a pretty major new type of
hash maps. Please expand on the problem it's trying to solve, how you
tested and benchmarked it, etc.
> Patch 1 is a preparation, patch 2 is the implementation of timeout
> map, patch 3 updates an existing hash map ptr test, patch 4 and
> patch 5 contain two test cases for timeout map.
>
> Please check each patch description for more details.
>
> ---
> v2: fix hashmap ptr test
> add a test case in map ptr test
> factor out htab_timeout_map_alloc()
>
> Cong Wang (5):
> bpf: use index instead of hash for map_locked[]
> bpf: introduce timeout map
> selftests/bpf: update elem_size check in map ptr test
> selftests/bpf: add a test case for bpf timeout map
> selftests/bpf: add timeout map check in map_ptr tests
>
> include/linux/bpf_types.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 +-
> kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 301 ++++++++++++++++--
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 3 +-
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c | 22 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 41 +++
> 7 files changed, 340 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists