[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201216132606.27201e16@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 13:26:06 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ibmvnic: merge do_change_param_reset into
do_reset
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 02:30:08 -0600 Lijun Pan wrote:
> Commit b27507bb59ed ("net/ibmvnic: unlock rtnl_lock in reset so
> linkwatch_event can run") introduced do_change_param_reset function to
> solve the rtnl lock issue. Majority of the code in do_change_param_reset
> duplicates do_reset. Also, we can handle the rtnl lock issue in do_reset
> itself. Hence merge do_change_param_reset back into do_reset to clean up
> the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <ljp@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> This patch was accepted into net-next as 16b5f5ce351f but was reverted
> in 9f32c27eb4fc to yield to other under-testing patches. Since those
> bug fix patches are already accepted, resubmit this one.
The merge window has started now, and we're merging net into net-next
pretty much every week, so this could have been done sooner. Let's wait
for net-next to reopen.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists