lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Dec 2020 17:25:13 -0800
From:   Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
        Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 1/3] net: extract napi poll functionality to __napi_poll()

From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name> 

This commit introduces a new function __napi_poll() which does the main
logic of the existing napi_poll() function, and will be called by other
functions in later commits.
This idea and implementation is done by Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name> and
is proposed as part of the patch to move napi work to work_queue
context.
This commit by itself is a code restructure.

Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 0fd0d4eb678c..adf74573f51c 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6765,15 +6765,10 @@ void __netif_napi_del(struct napi_struct *napi)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__netif_napi_del);
 
-static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
+static int __napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, bool *repoll)
 {
-	void *have;
 	int work, weight;
 
-	list_del_init(&n->poll_list);
-
-	have = netpoll_poll_lock(n);
-
 	weight = n->weight;
 
 	/* This NAPI_STATE_SCHED test is for avoiding a race
@@ -6793,7 +6788,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
 			    n->poll, work, weight);
 
 	if (likely(work < weight))
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return work;
 
 	/* Drivers must not modify the NAPI state if they
 	 * consume the entire weight.  In such cases this code
@@ -6802,7 +6797,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(napi_disable_pending(n))) {
 		napi_complete(n);
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return work;
 	}
 
 	/* The NAPI context has more processing work, but busy-polling
@@ -6815,7 +6810,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
 			 */
 			napi_schedule(n);
 		}
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return work;
 	}
 
 	if (n->gro_bitmask) {
@@ -6833,9 +6828,29 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
 	if (unlikely(!list_empty(&n->poll_list))) {
 		pr_warn_once("%s: Budget exhausted after napi rescheduled\n",
 			     n->dev ? n->dev->name : "backlog");
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return work;
 	}
 
+	*repoll = true;
+
+	return work;
+}
+
+static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
+{
+	bool do_repoll = false;
+	void *have;
+	int work;
+
+	list_del_init(&n->poll_list);
+
+	have = netpoll_poll_lock(n);
+
+	work = __napi_poll(n, &do_repoll);
+
+	if (!do_repoll)
+		goto out_unlock;
+
 	list_add_tail(&n->poll_list, repoll);
 
 out_unlock:
-- 
2.29.2.684.gfbc64c5ab5-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists