[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201216164838.55f939a2@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 16:48:38 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Gao Yan <gao.yanB@....com>
Cc: <paulus@...ba.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: remove disc_data_lock in ppp line discipline
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 23:00:54 +0800 Gao Yan wrote:
> tty layer provide tty->ldisc_sem lock to protect tty->disc_data;
> For examlpe, when cpu A is running ppp_synctty_ioctl that
> hold the tty->ldisc_sem, so if cpu B calls ppp_synctty_close,
> it will wait until cpu A release tty->ldisc_sem. So I think it is
> unnecessary to have the disc_data_lock;
>
> cpu A cpu B
> tty_ioctl tty_reopen
> ->hold tty->ldisc_sem ->hold tty->ldisc_sem(write), failed
> ->ld->ops->ioctl ->wait...
> ->release tty->ldisc_sem ->wait...OK,hold tty->ldisc_sem
> ->tty_ldisc_reinit
> ->tty_ldisc_close
> ->ld->ops->close
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Yan <gao.yanB@....com>
# Form letter - net-next is closed
We have already sent the networking pull request for 5.11 and therefore
net-next is closed for new drivers, features, code refactoring and
optimizations. We are currently accepting bug fixes only.
Please repost when net-next reopens after 5.11-rc1 is cut.
Look out for the announcement on the mailing list or check:
http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/net-next.html
RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists