netdev - Re: [PATCH] atm: ambassador: remove h from printk format specifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201217092816.7b739b8c@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:28:16 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc:     3chas3@...il.com, linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atm: ambassador: remove h from printk format specifier

On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 05:17:24 -0800 Tom Rix wrote:
> On 12/16/20 4:45 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 06:22:28 -0800 trix@...hat.com wrote:  
> >> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> >>
> >> See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst.
> >> h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>  
> > That's for new code I assume?
> >
> > What's the harm in leaving this ancient code be?  
> 
> This change is part of a tree wide cleanup.

What's the purpose of the "clean up"? Why is it making the code better?

This is a quote from your change:

-  PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %hx", debug &= DBG_MASK);
+  PRINTK (KERN_NOTICE, "debug bitmap is %x", debug &= DBG_MASK);

Are you sure that the use of %hx is the worst part of that line?

> drivers/atm status is listed as Maintained in MAINTAINERS so changes
> like this should be ok.
> 
> Should drivers/atm status be changed?

Up to Chas, but AFAIU we're probably only a few years away from ATM as 
a whole walking into the light. So IMHO "Obsolete" would be justified.