netdev - Re: [PATCH net] docs: netdev-FAQ: add missing underlines to questions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201217103517.6ac75a97@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Dec 2020 10:35:17 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] docs: netdev-FAQ: add missing underlines to
 questions

On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 19:18:19 +0200 Baruch Siach wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
> ---
>  Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst | 18 +++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
> index 4b9ed5874d5a..4ef90fe26640 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ focus for ``net`` is on stabilization and bug fixes.
>  Finally, the vX.Y gets released, and the whole cycle starts over.
>  
>  Q: So where are we now in this cycle?
> +-------------------------------------
>  
>  Load the mainline (Linus) page here:
>  
> @@ -108,6 +109,7 @@ with.
>  Q: I sent a patch and I'm wondering what happened to it?
>  --------------------------------------------------------
>  Q: How can I tell whether it got merged?
> +----------------------------------------

I think this and the following fixes should be folded into a single
line (unless it's possible in RST for header to span multiple lines):

I sent a patch and I'm wondering what happened to it - how can I tell whether it got merged?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To be honest I think we can also drop the Q: and A: prefixes now that
we're using RST.

And perhaps we can add an index of questions at the beginning of the
the file?