[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201217110310.fqkn7dh5sre7ycqb@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 11:03:11 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Vadym Kochan <vkochan@...vell.com>,
Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 5/9] net: dsa: remove the transactional logic
from MDB entries
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 03:58:18AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> For many drivers, the .port_mdb_prepare callback was not a good opportunity
> to avoid any error condition, and they would suppress errors found during
> the actual commit phase.
>
> Where a logical separation between the prepare and the commit phase
> existed, the function that used to implement the .port_mdb_prepare
> callback still exists, but now it is called directly from .port_mdb_add,
> which was modified to return an int code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/net/dsa/switch.c b/net/dsa/switch.c
> index 39848eac1da8..65124bc3ddfb 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/switch.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/switch.c
> @@ -178,35 +178,13 @@ static bool dsa_switch_mdb_match(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> return false;
> }
>
> -static int dsa_switch_mdb_prepare(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> - struct dsa_notifier_mdb_info *info)
> -{
> - int port, err;
> -
> - if (!ds->ops->port_mdb_prepare || !ds->ops->port_mdb_add)
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> - for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) {
> - if (dsa_switch_mdb_match(ds, port, info)) {
> - err = ds->ops->port_mdb_prepare(ds, port, info->mdb);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int dsa_switch_mdb_add(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> struct dsa_notifier_mdb_info *info)
> {
> int port;
>
> - if (switchdev_trans_ph_prepare(info->trans))
> - return dsa_switch_mdb_prepare(ds, info);
> -
> if (!ds->ops->port_mdb_add)
> - return 0;
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++)
> if (dsa_switch_mdb_match(ds, port, info))
> --
> 2.25.1
>
For anybody who wants to test, I forgot to update dsa_switch_mdb_add to
propagate the errors. It should look like this:
static int dsa_switch_mdb_add(struct dsa_switch *ds,
struct dsa_notifier_mdb_info *info)
{
int err = 0;
int port;
if (!ds->ops->port_mdb_add)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) {
if (dsa_switch_mdb_match(ds, port, info)) {
err = ds->ops->port_mdb_add(ds, port, info->mdb);
if (err)
break;
}
}
return err;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists