[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c178b5db-3de4-5f02-eee3-c9e69393174a@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:30:20 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Murali Krishna Policharla <murali.policharla@...adcom.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
"open list:BROADCOM SYSTEMPORT ETHERNET DRIVER"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: systemport: set dev->max_mtu to
UMAC_MAX_MTU_SIZE
On 12/18/20 12:24 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 09:38:43AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> The driver is already allocating receive buffers of 2KiB and the
>> Ethernet MAC is configured to accept frames up to UMAC_MAX_MTU_SIZE.
>>
>> Fixes: bfcb813203e6 ("net: dsa: configure the MTU for switch ports")
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmsysport.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmsysport.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmsysport.c
>> index 0fdd19d99d99..b1ae9eb8f247 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmsysport.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmsysport.c
>> @@ -2577,6 +2577,7 @@ static int bcm_sysport_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX;
>> dev->hw_features |= dev->features;
>> dev->vlan_features |= dev->features;
>> + dev->max_mtu = UMAC_MAX_MTU_SIZE;
>>
>> /* Request the WOL interrupt and advertise suspend if available */
>> priv->wol_irq_disabled = 1;
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
> Do you want to treat the SYSTEMPORT Lite differently?
>
> /* Set maximum frame length */
> if (!priv->is_lite)
> umac_writel(priv, UMAC_MAX_MTU_SIZE, UMAC_MAX_FRAME_LEN);
> else
> gib_set_pad_extension(priv);
SYSTEMPORT Lite does not actually validate the frame length, so setting
a maximum number to the buffer size we allocate could work, but I don't
see a reason to differentiate the two types of MACs here.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists