netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next V9 7/7] bpf/selftests: tests using bpf_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201218115320.396dbcfc@carbon>
Date:   Fri, 18 Dec 2020 11:53:20 +0100
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        maze@...gle.com, lmb@...udflare.com, shaun@...era.io,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, marek@...udflare.com,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, eyal.birger@...il.com,
        colrack@...il.com, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V9 7/7] bpf/selftests: tests using
 bpf_check_mtu BPF-helper

On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 18:26:50 +0100
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:

> Adding selftest for BPF-helper bpf_check_mtu(). Making sure
> it can be used from both XDP and TC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c |  204 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c |  196 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 400 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c

Will send V10 as I have an error in this selftests

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b5d0c3a9abe8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
[...]
> +static void test_check_mtu_run_xdp(struct test_check_mtu *skel,
> +				   struct bpf_program *prog,
> +				   __u32 mtu_expect)
> +{
> +	const char *prog_name = bpf_program__name(prog);
> +	int retval_expect = XDP_PASS;
> +	__u32 mtu_result = 0;
> +	char buf[256];
> +	int err;
> +
> +	struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr tattr = {
> +		.repeat = 1,
> +		.data_in = &pkt_v4,
> +		.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
> +		.data_out = buf,
> +		.data_size_out = sizeof(buf),
> +		.prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog),
> +	};
> +
> +	memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
> +
> +	err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr);
> +	CHECK_ATTR(err != 0 || errno != 0, "bpf_prog_test_run",
                               ^^^^^^^^^^^
You/I cannot use the check "errno != 0" here, as something else could
have set it earlier.


> +		   "prog_name:%s (err %d errno %d retval %d)\n",
> +		   prog_name, err, errno, tattr.retval);
> +
> +        CHECK(tattr.retval != retval_expect, "retval",
> +	      "progname:%s unexpected retval=%d expected=%d\n",
> +	      prog_name, tattr.retval, retval_expect);
> +
> +	/* Extract MTU that BPF-prog got */
> +	mtu_result = skel->bss->global_bpf_mtu_xdp;
> +	CHECK(mtu_result != mtu_expect, "MTU-compare-user",
> +	      "failed (MTU user:%d bpf:%d)", mtu_expect, mtu_result);
> +}


> +static void test_check_mtu_run_tc(struct test_check_mtu *skel,
> +				  struct bpf_program *prog,
> +				  __u32 mtu_expect)
> +{
[...]
> +	err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr);
> +	CHECK_ATTR(err != 0 || errno != 0, "bpf_prog_test_run",
> +		   "prog_name:%s (err %d errno %d retval %d)\n",
> +		   prog_name, err, errno, tattr.retval);

Same issue here.


-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer