[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd=dia5_a3dYvxd14UxHzL-FPuggi7SrwKdY1PUm7j9Ug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:35:18 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Pieter Jansen Van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvv@...boosystems.io>,
Jon <jon@...id-run.com>, "linux.cj" <linux.cj@...il.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 06/14] net: mdiobus: Introduce fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy()
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 7:34 AM Calvin Johnson
<calvin.johnson@....nxp.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 07:33:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 6:44 PM Calvin Johnson
> > <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com> wrote:
...
> > > + /* phy->mii_ts may already be defined by the PHY driver. A
> > > + * mii_timestamper probed via the device tree will still have
> > > + * precedence.
> > > + */
> >
> > > + if (mii_ts)
> > > + phy->mii_ts = mii_ts;
> >
> > How is that defined? Do you need to do something with an old pointer?
>
> As the comment says, I think PHY drivers which got invoked before calling
> of_mdiobus_register_phy() may have defined phy->mii_ts.
What I meant here is that the old pointer might need some care (freeing?).
> > > + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists